What to Think of 'Small Faith Communities'

     Unfortunately, the SFC’s that have appeared in various countries seem to have developed a different agenda. In the USA they have assumed the need to take over from “defunct parishes” and to establish a democratic, “lay-centered Church” that is focused on Leftist-liberal struggle for “social justice”. There are overtones of liberating Catholics from the “restraints of Catholic dogma”, being freed from the “oppressive shackles of priests and Bishops”, and to control their own liturgies. The most extreme SFC’s may be said to be in Latin America where 100,000 “Base Communities” have been active as heralds of “Liberation theology”, being influenced by Marxist class warfare ideas and becoming involved in Leftist socialist revolutions.

     In the USA, advocates of SFC’s declare the Catholic Church is being “reborn with small grassroots communities” to restructure the Church. There are 3 groups involved in their organization:

1. The North American Forum for Small Christian communities in Joliet, Illinois (Claiming 15,000 SFC’s);
2. The National Alliance of parishes Restructuring Into Communities based in Troy, Michigan;
3. and, Buena Vista in Arvada, Colorado.

     SFC’s are said to come about because “too many of us feel unseen, unheard, or anonymous within the parish to experience any sense of belonging to community.” The leading guru of SFC’s who has held countless workshops is Detroit’s Fr. Arthur Baranowski who registers his pleasure that: “SFC’s change the way people view the Church; they start to see themselves as the Church.” Many SFC’s have resulted from members’ participation in other groups: Marriage Encounter, Cursillo, Christian Family Movement, various Peace and Justice groups, the parish’ Rite of Christian Initiation of Adults, and, of course, the over-estimated RENEW groups.

     What is disturbing about the kind of SFC’s one usually encounters is the sense of satisfaction they register at the shortage of priests in parishes and the increase of “priestless parishes”. Then too, there is the dominance of “facilitators” wedded to ultra-liberal ideas about the “Social Gospel”. They express, along the lines of a democratic-congregationalism, the desire to shift power from the clergy to the laity with an accompanying disdain for the pronouncements of the Successor of Peter on the moral issues of the day.

     There is disregard for the teaching of the Magisterium on contraception, abortion and homosexuality as allegedly violating the freedom of individual conscience. Thus, the life-experiences of “grassroots Church communities” allowing dissent from Magisterial teachings becomes their “faith-sharing”. Where Dissent and Disobedience to Papal authority becomes part of the mind-set of SFC’s rebellion against Catholic doctrine on contraception, abortion and homosexuality, clearly their “community faith-sharing” is NOT a sharing in the Catholic Faith. It is not surprising, then, that such SFC’s have little concern to evangelize, that is, to actually convert non-Catholics to the “Institutional Church” which, in fact, they condemn as irrelevant to “modern Catholics”.

     It is not surprising, also, that the “faith-sharing” and “community life-experiences” of the SFC’s degenerate into the sharing of personal feelings about life (and the Church) where people are manipulated in a kind of therapy session to “let it all hang out”.

     Fr. Baranowski explains a major theme of the SFC approach: